Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 20:42:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 20:42:11 -0500 Received: from www.ylenurme.ee ([193.40.6.1]:39421 "EHLO ylenurme.ee") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 20:41:55 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 03:11:21 +0200 (GMT-2) From: Elmer Joandi To: Rogier Wolff cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Universal debug macros. In-Reply-To: <200011270045.BAA13121@cave.bitwizard.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Rogier Wolff wrote: > Now, how is say "Red Hat" (*) going to ship kernels? Of course they are > going to turn off debugging. Then I'll be stuck with a non-recompiling > user-in-trouble with a non-debugging-enabled kernel. Red Hat will ship two kernels. Well, they actually ship now about 4 ones or something. So they will ship 8. Plus they will ship a script that recompiles kernel without user crawling in documentation. It should be an option in linuxconf: recompile local kernel: debug-nodebug-optimized-localized-nonmodular-server-router-workstation which compiles and installs 2 hardware/situation optimized/configured kernels: debug and production. I am sure company like redhat can ship a little new linuxconf module. Don't worry, people can make good use of multiple options. If you provide orthogonal tools they will provide orthogonal solutions. elmer. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/