Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:31:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:30:54 -0500 Received: from mx5.sac.fedex.com ([199.81.194.37]:15879 "EHLO mx5.sac.fedex.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:30:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:01:30 +0800 (SGT) From: Jeff Chua X-X-Sender: root@boston.corp.fedex.com To: Stephan von Krawczynski cc: Jeff Chua , Alan Cox , Thomas Hood , Linux Kernel , Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: 2.4.18-pre7 slow ... apm problem In-Reply-To: <200201282309.AAA22703@webserver.ithnet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on ENTPM11/FEDEX(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/29/2002 09:05:39 PM, Serialize by Router on ENTPM11/FEDEX(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/29/2002 09:05:41 PM, Serialize complete at 01/29/2002 09:05:41 PM Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > Ok, I cannot see this one, I have no APM enabled on my boxes. Sorry. If I set apm idle off, vmware guest os "ping localhost" works fine. > As I never saw this with vmware 2 (even not on 2.4.18-pre7) I would > say version 3 has a real problem somewhere. Never had any problem with vmware3 until pre7. Try to test vmware2 on pre7 with apm cpu_idle enabled. I think you'll see the same problem. Again, pre6 with apm cpu_idle enabled works fine. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/