Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758582AbYHUKoR (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:44:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755463AbYHUKoA (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:44:00 -0400 Received: from smtp110.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.220]:25119 "HELO smtp110.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754382AbYHUKn7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:43:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=lX+Vth1QXqT3tva+QjMW49lcw7fhkLad1KmK8MIw8sh5zw/1UVyJOZbKOPK8IGeBb2BrZL408aBAqs1EFHJQoLZF/7PH+6MVYIfkC69BEqSy6n3tQ6aBRXCqo9IjvneFSZxIjB8HHHB4kvvEn5uzvkFJcvC6m1zObqI9AE3h7AQ= ; X-YMail-OSG: 47szqIIVM1krGP3Hc_9R5Il909OWluR7jRbjzzGUfSHxoorxEhd4ZDisGs0CVYHCJP2rl3XLDAiHlkLrd0lsbL_qYcID.hwpavfcL6NWVshEdFjqN57zeeOgJkEJc41kdak- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: carsteno@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] AXFS: Advanced XIP filesystem Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:43:50 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: jaredeh@gmail.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd , =?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rn_Engel?= , tim.bird@am.sony.com References: <48AD00C4.6060302@gmail.com> <48AD42AE.4030107@de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <48AD42AE.4030107@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808212043.51209.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1024 Lines: 20 On Thursday 21 August 2008 20:25, Carsten Otte wrote: > Jared Hulbert wrote: > > I'd like to get a first round of review on my AXFS filesystem. > > I like the general approach of it. It's much more flexible than the > ext2 extension I've done, and the possibility to select XIP vs. > compression per page is really really neat. I can imagine that people > will prefer this over the ext2 implementation on s390. It is unclear > to me how the "secondary block device" thing is supposed to work. > Could you elaborate a bit on that? Agreed. I haven't had a good look through it yet, but at a glance it looks pretty neat. The VM side of things looks pretty reasonable (I fear XIP faulting might have another race or two, but that's a core mm issue rather than filesystem specific). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/