Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758028AbYHUMxl (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:53:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754062AbYHUMxb (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:53:31 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:51787 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753237AbYHUMxa (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:53:30 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] AXFS: Advanced XIP filesystem Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:53:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: carsteno@de.ibm.com, jaredeh@gmail.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd , =?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rn_Engel?= , tim.bird@am.sony.com References: <48AD00C4.6060302@gmail.com> <48AD42AE.4030107@de.ibm.com> <200808212043.51209.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200808212043.51209.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808211453.26233.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX194FfgrD2U1sWsihk7KUL43emnHRsz7G48Nv+A aITM4kEx6wtRzdPiMwxVEdkvYB9rhWb+rGUwOYGPW29EzaAlG7 tcDIlYUAkqq17NtdMpf2Q== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1521 Lines: 32 On Thursday 21 August 2008, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Thursday 21 August 2008 20:25, Carsten Otte wrote: > > Jared Hulbert wrote: > > > I'd like to get a first round of review on my AXFS filesystem. > > > > I like the general approach of it. It's much more flexible than the > > ext2 extension I've done, and the possibility to select XIP vs. > > compression per page is really really neat. I can imagine that people > > will prefer this over the ext2 implementation on s390. It is unclear > > to me how the "secondary block device" thing is supposed to work. > > Could you elaborate a bit on that? > > Agreed. I haven't had a good look through it yet, but at a glance it > looks pretty neat. The VM side of things looks pretty reasonable > (I fear XIP faulting might have another race or two, but that's a > core mm issue rather than filesystem specific). Yes, I also like the file system, I guess this is 2.6.28 material and you should have it added to linux-next when you have addressed the comments so far. One thing that would be really nice is if you could add fake-write support in the way that I proposed for cramfs a few months ago. This would make axfs much more interesting for another set of users, and keep cramfs a really simple example file system. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/