Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756366AbYHUOLW (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:11:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754212AbYHUOLM (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:11:12 -0400 Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.189]:20432 "EHLO rn-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754107AbYHUOLK (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:11:10 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=xfMkFXGvJUm+W2E6mA1Hr9hMP8wRzAYj+KUip0js9kZfmKSpJQ0hfEE0Vp01+Rs9P+ mEp6ibYUEB8603+QmLBmBZKkrx3crvatEgJMtiKo446gLrDM5RlVn9FkZ3aWGUEohlWo TfLPsjeDhf0diVupqpWHfLR0F5gjZM2TZuDeo= Message-ID: <6934efce0808210711t686a88eci6eb294dbb54d68fe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:11:08 -0700 From: "Jared Hulbert" To: "Jamie Lokier" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] AXFS: Advanced XIP filesystem Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd , "=?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rn_Engel?=" , tim.bird@am.sony.com, cotte@de.ibm.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au In-Reply-To: <20080821110749.GA1926@shareable.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48AD00C4.6060302@gmail.com> <20080821110749.GA1926@shareable.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1144 Lines: 22 > How does it fare with no MMU? Can the profiler and image builder lay > out the XIP pages in such a way that no-MMU mmaps can map those regions? > > No complaint if not, it would be a nice bonus though. Sorry. I don't believe it will work on no-MMU as is. That said you _could_ tweak the mkfs tool to lay mmap()'ed regions down contiguously but then if you mmap() an unprofiled region, well that would be bad. I suppose you could make axfs_mmap smart enough to handle that. I guess the cleanest way would be to just make files lay down contiguously, you lose some of the space saving but it would work. I'm not plannin to get to this anytime soon. But I'd be willing merge patches. Can anybody convince me offline that working on no-MMU this makes financial sense for my employer? This is getting to be a common question. How many noMMU users are out there and why are you so interested? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/