Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:39:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:39:33 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:9988 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:39:18 -0500 Subject: Re: Why 'linux/fs.h' cannot be included? I *can*... To: garzik@havoc.gtf.org (Jeff Garzik) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:51:43 +0000 (GMT) Cc: raul@viadomus.com (DervishD), ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020129093024.E10404@havoc.gtf.org> from "Jeff Garzik" at Jan 29, 2002 09:30:24 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Your libc should provide a "sanitized" version of the kernel headers, > which is completely separate from any kernel sources. > > dietlibc does this... it's completely independent of kernel header changes. > > RedHat will be doing this with glibc in the future. We already do. Red Hat shipped since about 7.0 has a seperate set of kernel based headers that glibc uses for its own internal use, and the set in the kernel sources. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/