Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760256AbYHUPHl (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:07:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756740AbYHUPH2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:07:28 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-159.bluehost.com ([67.222.39.39]:36909 "HELO outbound-mail-159.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756610AbYHUPH1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:07:27 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User; b=dgHs3G1zNC2eiB5W2eY9hfi5X/6M5tM2l7Hx1K7csGZGO8b9M9/4NhWfrhiq/y6mnd6Yawb/CiyYYe4/c9vVhEtY/7k9SKWb+PEaz/GgC4ImPpKm1E4GWR+REuoU1bKn; From: Jesse Barnes To: FUJITA Tomonori Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86 dma_*_coherent rework patchset v2 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:07:05 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: mingo@elte.hu, joerg.roedel@amd.com, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, muli@il.ibm.com References: <20080820094612.GA28492@elte.hu> <20080821120011.GD5615@elte.hu> <20080821231720S.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20080821231720S.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808210807.05996.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1094 Lines: 28 On Thursday, August 21, 2008 7:16 am FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > > Jesse, Fujita-san, do these changes look fine to you? > > > > > > Yeah, I'll let you push this time. :) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes > > > > with a v2.6.28 ETA, right? > > Surely, this patchset should be for 2.6.28. > > Can you send this via the x86 tree instead of pci? > > - IOMMU code is arch stuff rather than pci. > - We can avoid a mistake such as the previous one. Yeah I was thinking 2.6.28 too, via the x86 tree. The problem last time was that I sent it too soon (I misunderstood Ingo when he said it was ready) so we broke the build on some non-x86 platforms. I don't think that'll be an issue this time, but we may as well push through x86 anyway; I agree that IOMMU is really a platform feature more than a PCI one. Jesse -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/