Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760965AbYHUS7x (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:59:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755436AbYHUS7m (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:59:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:51834 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754012AbYHUS7k (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:59:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:59:39 -0400 From: "'Aristeu Rozanski'" To: Alan Cox Cc: Tosoni , "'Laurent Pinchart'" , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] 8250: add support for DTR/DSR hardware flow control Message-ID: <20080821185938.GG7154@redhat.com> References: <200808071032.16709.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <000f01c8f88c$ad29d950$2e01a8c0@acksys.local> <20080818162526.1975dace@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20080820214336.GN17926@cathedrallabs.org> <20080821112309.6519c29f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080821112309.6519c29f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1520 Lines: 34 > > > > About a RS485 ioctl: could you consider the attached files which are already > > > > in the Linux kernel (in include/asm-cris). > > > > They define a TIOCSERSETRS485 (ioctl.h), and the data structure (rs485.h) > > > > with allows to specify timings. Sounds just like what we want ? > > > > > > I had a deeper look at this for RS485 and the answer is "sort of". I've > > > reworked the structure to keep it the same size irrespective of 32/64bit > > > systems, and to make stuff flags that can be, plus add some extra u32 > > > words in case we need to (.. when we need to ;)) add stuff later. > > > > > > Comments, thoughts - will this do what people in the RS485 world need ? > > as for DTR/DSR patch, will be used the same approach? > > I'm still trying to get a sensible answer on how other Unixes handle it I did some research on that: Solaris and AIX: TC{G,S}ETX for extended options and only input flow control (DTRXOFF) SCO: {S,G}ETFLOW for configuring flow control, TXHARD, RXHARD for DTRDSR FreeBSD: cflags has 'dtrflow' and 'dsrflow' Having the option to set individually which pins to use for input and output flow control and which ones should be on/off all the time seem to be a powerful way to do it, instead of having a "CDTRDSR". -- Aristeu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/