Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759138AbYHVCFT (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:05:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752003AbYHVCFF (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:05:05 -0400 Received: from smtp108.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.218]:35941 "HELO smtp108.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751611AbYHVCFE (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:05:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=tLUS7VLkjZK0iAYMM86gUeONjtoldl2j2v54MZrFsCZwkJ0iuRWpCPccD71PGsBvsMZfjJk16R/rMQBTTT8oXO32K7KOh6Js2M2zwStIx0ANHPtoKZJ6o1y4k7xmvKhKse/aDfQqE9+1AmmbeL7T/RwzZ+di9gqcxgB5hFotgZk= ; X-YMail-OSG: uaS5cgQVM1mqCT59UGF1mlGOqpBFVwOPUMmnzgqJCIHh2AelINm7DzEmFeOB2iioG.IX5SBCqFQUU7cI0MDzgWN8W1EHJ39yUrX039Nc2yKTzOxMTa5ilw3GIe9u9FuKIdI- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: "Jared Hulbert" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] AXFS: Advanced XIP filesystem Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:04:57 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: "Frans Meulenbroeks" , Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd , "=?utf-8?q?J=C3=B6rn?= Engel" , tim.bird@am.sony.com, cotte@de.ibm.com References: <48AD00C4.6060302@gmail.com> <6934efce0808211232i21fcf347vb6baa6502246adb2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6934efce0808211232i21fcf347vb6baa6502246adb2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808221204.57413.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 950 Lines: 24 On Friday 22 August 2008 05:32, Jared Hulbert wrote: > > Jared, nice work! > > - would axfs be suitable as a filesystem on a ram disk? > > It could be. I plan on implementing support for brd. That might work > nicely. I was going to take a look at this too. With any luck, it should be little effort required as it looks like you have the block device support in place? This filesystem actually should in theory work fairly well with brd, because then we wouldn't have to bring the data over into pagecache for frequently used pages but we can retain the compressed storage for the infrequently used stuff. I say in theory because I don't know of any serious users (except kernel testing) of brd :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/