Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:26:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:25:57 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:60686 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:25:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:25:26 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Oliver Xymoron Cc: Daniel Phillips , Linus Torvalds , Josh MacDonald , linux-kernel , , Subject: Re: Note describing poor dcache utilization under high memory pressure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Oliver Xymoron wrote: > Daniel's approach seems to be workable (once he's spelled out all the > details) but it misses the big performance win for fork/exec, which is > surely the common case. Given that exec will be throwing away all these > mappings, we can safely assume that we will not be inheriting many shared > mappings from parents of parents so Daniel's approach also still ends up > marking most of the pages RO still. It gets worse. His approach also needs to adjust the reference counts on all pages (and swap pages). kind regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/