Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:27:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:27:48 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:16143 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:27:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:27:22 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Hartmut Holz Cc: Linux kernel Subject: Re: rmap12a slower than rmap11c (mpeg/VCD) In-Reply-To: <3C56CCED.6040801@arcor.de> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Hartmut Holz wrote: > if I play mpeg/VCD with rmap12a, I recognize that rmap12a is slower > than rmap11c. (PII 450 MHz - SMP, Matrox G450 - PCI). I think there's > nothing to measure. GTV shows with both patches about 25 fps. But what > I see on the screen is different It would be interesting if you could show me 10 lines of 'vmstat 5' output with both kernels so I have a better idea of where to start tracking down the problem ... (even if it isn't directly measurable "feeling slower" is a bug I want to fix) kind regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/