Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754066AbYHVLLt (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:11:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750861AbYHVLLm (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:11:42 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.186]:53173 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750787AbYHVLLl (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:11:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; b=cQV427RGYFqS+3O26aGKTenH7mIrnDo9qNq/b3TEhMo0gGH5LPK2RQ1To8cdulGrfI aQfA8ieKSgPyKA4lwPuvO51gISd/7vRkIfj6qttleQT3q8RuOd2hzzjsvIfpeXeLG7nU A6STeTTEOCoN6q4JGJAEEGH8fBdVJ8eKJwRdY= Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:13:01 +0400 To: Andi Kleen Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Jones , Vegard Nossum , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: latest -git: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/ipi.c:123 send_IPI_mask_bitmask+0xc3/0xe0() Message-ID: <20080822111301.GA2321@x200.localdomain> References: <19f34abd0808191251x4eb61c50n13ecf7c90f0f3d9f@mail.gmail.com> <20080820013930.GN9807@one.firstfloor.org> <19f34abd0808192326jc10e758m99e76bbd5714c5b8@mail.gmail.com> <20080822003659.GA7581@redhat.com> <48AE20B8.9000204@kernel.org> <20080822022841.GG23334@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080822022841.GG23334@one.firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: adobriyan@gmail.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 898 Lines: 21 On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 04:28:41AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > You may want to see if this patch fixes the problem; it does *NOT* have > > the correct error behaviour (some of the intervening layers don't > > propagate errors), but it should make the fault go away. > > The alternative would be to just take out those msr_on_cpu() > interfaces again. Right now they are useless in the kernel, > but still cause problems. > > They were only added for OpenVZ's vCPUs which they back then > promised me would hit mainline soon. There were no such promises made. Reread thread. > But that was some time ago and there wasn't much progress on this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/