Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:49:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:48:58 -0500 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:56477 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:48:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:48:21 -0700 Message-Id: <200201291748.g0THmLS23684@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua Cc: Borsenkow Andrej , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] KERN_INFO for devfs In-Reply-To: <200201291140.g0TBecE28017@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> In-Reply-To: <000701c1a8b1$2f493850$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> <200201291140.g0TBecE28017@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Denis Vlasenko writes: > > > Why do you think they _have to_ have "none"? Is it POSIXized or > > > otherwise standardized? Where can I RTFM? > > > > I do not think they have to. They just are :-) > > > > fs/namespace.c:show_vfsmnt() > > > > ... > > mangle(m, mnt->mnt_devname ? mnt->mnt_devname : "none"); > > > > > > I find this convention quite useful. It allows any program to easily > > skip virtual filesystems. Using something like /dev or devfs in this > > case does not add any bit of useful information but possibly adds to > > confusion. > > Maybe you're right. It's up to maintainer to decide. > Richard, do you need updated patch without "none" -> "devfs"? Don't bother. I've gone through the code and done it myself, making some other minor changes as I go along. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/