Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754234AbYHVNrh (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:47:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754020AbYHVNr1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:47:27 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:51112 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752429AbYHVNr0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:47:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 06:47:20 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cl@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, manfred@colorfullife.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, schamp@sgi.com, niv@us.ibm.com, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, ego@in.ibm.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, rostedt@goodmis.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC, tip/core/rcu] scalable classic RCU implementation Message-ID: <20080822134720.GG6875@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20080821234318.GA1754@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080822043715.GD15212@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080822043715.GD15212@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1877 Lines: 50 On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 06:37:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > +#define MAX_RCU_LEVELS 3 > > +#if NR_CPUS <= CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVELS 1 > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_1 1 > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_2 NR_CPUS > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_3 0 > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_4 0 > > +#define NUM_RCU_NODES NUM_RCU_LEVEL_1 > > +#elif NR_CPUS <= CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT * CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVELS 2 > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_1 1 > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_2 \ > > + (((NR_CPUS) + (CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT) - 1) / (CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT)) > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_3 NR_CPUS > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_4 0 > > +#define NUM_RCU_NODES \ > > + ((NUM_RCU_LEVEL_1) + (NUM_RCU_LEVEL_2)) > > +#elif NR_CPUS <= CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT * CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT * CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVELS 3 > > +#define RCU_FANOUT_SQ ((CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT) * (CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT)) > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_1 1 > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_2 \ > > + (((NR_CPUS) + (RCU_FANOUT_SQ) - 1) / (RCU_FANOUT_SQ)) > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_3 \ > > + ((NR_CPUS) + (CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT) - 1) / (CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT) > > +#define NUM_RCU_LEVEL_4 NR_CPUS > > +#define NUM_RCU_NODES \ > > + ((NUM_RCU_LEVEL_1) + \ > > + (NUM_RCU_LEVEL_2) + \ > > + (NUM_RCU_LEVEL_3)) > > +#else > > +#error "CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT insufficient for NR_CPUS" > > +#endif > > just a quick stylistic suggestion: if feasible then such sizing ugliness > should be hidden in a Kconfig file. (if Kconfig is capable enough for > this that is) I have no idea if Kconfig can do it, but I will check. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/