Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754184AbYHYChS (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:37:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751143AbYHYChG (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:37:06 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.233]:3096 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750801AbYHYChF (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:37:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=hjckST6v3/0Io+rVsG1pJpnYvPeGnDQ4As7Xc7zIsDh3G9KBkjeseJ3BUxulzqdS5L Af3HVH8Itx/tQFtKgM5vB5yepvZpH3CeGjz0bAED7v3YOdjyf7y06RGFvCRYJQb4ops+ 6kH9Ef8zVUTebn919EBe1M6BWggw7FmewxTKA= Message-ID: <86802c440808241937g1b8822c5r5de75c2a7eb17532@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:37:04 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "David Witbrodt" Subject: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Linux-kernel Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <914225.91320.qm@web82104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <914225.91320.qm@web82104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1163 Lines: 39 On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:00 PM, David Witbrodt wrote: > > >> after discussing with Ingo, we have one more generic way to detect the >> same situation. >> >> please help to verify the attached patch. ( don't apply previous patch) > > Geez, a guy tries to leave so he doesn't get banned because of his stupid > webmail client, and... oh, never mind... ;) > > > Results: > > 1) patch applied perfectly to tip/master. > > 2) patched file compiles without warning or error. > (I thought there would be a type mismatch -- the "base" variable in your > patch is unsigned long, while "res->start" is resource_size_t ==> > u64 ==> unsigned long long, but I must have been mistaken.) > > 3) kernel builds fine > > 4) reboot hangs at the familiar call of inet_init() ok, could be something. anyway, can you test patch only_put_e820_ram_in_res_tree.patch that should be final solution for all. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/