Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753354AbYHYKXk (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:23:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753566AbYHYKXc (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:23:32 -0400 Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:23523 "EHLO il.qumranet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753150AbYHYKXb (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:23:31 -0400 Message-ID: <48B28822.1010103@qumranet.com> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:23:30 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [Bug #11254] KVM: fix userspace ABI breakage References: <20080824192714.GC1627@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> In-Reply-To: <20080824192714.GC1627@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 765 Lines: 21 Adrian Bunk wrote: > The discussion in Bugzilla whether it is a regression at all can be > condensed to the following question: > > Can a struct that is part of the 2.6.26 userspace headers be defined to > be part of an "experimental ABI" and therefore be changed? > It is part of the experimental ABI. However, as I'm going to apply your patch (as being the simplest fix, and as there is no measurable performance impact), the question is moot. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/