Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:57:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:57:01 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:43787 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:56:50 -0500 To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin In-Reply-To: From: Andi Kleen Date: 29 Jan 2002 22:56:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: Alan Cox's message of "29 Jan 2002 14:14:30 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox writes: > > If a patch gets ignored 33 times in a row then perhaps the person doing > > the patch should first think really hard about the following 4 issues: > > Lots of the stuff getting missed is tiny little fixes, obvious 3 or 4 liners. > The big stuff is not the problem most times. That stuff does get ripped to "Most times". For example the EA patches have badly failed so far, just because Linus ignored all patches to add sys call numbers for a repeatedly discussed and stable API and nobody else can add syscall numbers on i386. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/