Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S283003AbSA2WKD>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:10:03 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S284144AbSA2WJx>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:09:53 -0500
Received: from ns.caldera.de ([212.34.180.1]:40896 "EHLO ns.caldera.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S283003AbSA2WJe>;
	Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:09:34 -0500
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:08:52 +0100
Message-Id: <200201292208.g0TM8ql17622@ns.caldera.de>
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@ns.caldera.de>
To: ak@suse.de (Andi Kleen)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin
X-Newsgroups: caldera.lists.linux.kernel
In-Reply-To: <p73aduwddni.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.13 (i686))
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

In article <p73aduwddni.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de> you wrote:
> "Most times". For example the EA patches have badly failed so far, just because
> Linus ignored all patches to add sys call numbers for a repeatedly discussed 
> and stable API and nobody else can add syscall numbers on i386. 

There still seems to be a lot of discussion vs EAs and ACLs.
Setting the suboptimal XFS APIs in stone doesn't make the discussion
easier.

	Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/