Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754693AbYHYPRL (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:17:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752740AbYHYPQ5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:16:57 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:54540 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751526AbYHYPQ4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:16:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:16:45 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Josh Triplett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cl@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, manfred@colorfullife.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, schamp@sgi.com, niv@us.ibm.com, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, ego@in.ibm.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, rostedt@goodmis.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC, tip/core/rcu] scalable classic RCU implementation Message-ID: <20080825151645.GB6745@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20080821234318.GA1754@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1219447772.5197.98.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com> <1219660496.8515.22.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1219660496.8515.22.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1964 Lines: 50 On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:34:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 16:29 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > @@ -26,8 +27,10 @@ > > > * http://lse.sourceforge.net/locking/rclock_OLS.2001.05.01c.sc.pdf (OLS2001) > > > * > > > * For detailed explanation of Read-Copy Update mechanism see - > > > - * Documentation/RCU > > > - * > > > + * Documentation/RCU > > > + * http://lwn.net/Articles/262464/ (What is RCU, Fundamentally?) > > > + * http://lwn.net/Articles/263130/ (What is RCU's Usage?) > > > + * http://lwn.net/Articles/264090/ (What is RCU's API? + references) > > > */ > > > > Why put these references here rather than in Documentation/RCU? It > > seems easier to keep documentation up to date in one place. If you > > think these represent a good "getting started" set of documents, how > > about a Documentation/RCU/ReadTheseFirst with links to them, or how > > about linking to them from whatisRCU.txt? > > I actually like in code comments and 'documentation' more than > Documentation/ stuff. Mostly because Documentation/ is: > - far away from the code > - therefore, more easily bitrotted > - and easily forgotten I know!!! #ifdef JOSH_TRIPLETT * Documentation/RCU * http://lwn.net/Articles/262464/ (What is RCU, Fundamentally?) * http://lwn.net/Articles/263130/ (What is RCU's Usage?) * http://lwn.net/Articles/264090/ (What is RCU's API? + references) #elif PETER_ZIJLSTRA * Documentation/RCU #endif (Sorry, couldn't resist!!!) Seriously, I know where all the documentation is, as I wrote most of it. These comments are for you guys. So, any thoughts on how I should resolve this? My default is, as always, a coin flip. ;-) Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/