Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S286413AbSA2XRP>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 18:17:15 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S286411AbSA2XP7>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 18:15:59 -0500
Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:27410 "EHLO
	neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S286871AbSA2XOL>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 18:14:11 -0500
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:13:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <nathans@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin
In-Reply-To: <p73d6zshidj.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201291502460.1747-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On 30 Jan 2002, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Does that answer your questions?
> Would you look at a patch again?

That answers the specific questions about Al and Stephen.

It does NOT address whether consensus has been reached in general, and
whether people are happy. Is that the case?

Also, obviously nobody actually took over maintainership of the patch,
because equally obviously nobody has been pinging me about it. For some
reason you seem to want _me_ to go out of my way to search for patches
that are over a month old that I don't know whether they are valid or not,
used or not, or even agreed upon or not.

But yes, it's so much easier to blame me.

			Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/