Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758157AbYHZOnQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:43:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754217AbYHZOnD (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:43:03 -0400 Received: from mlbe2k2.cs.myharris.net ([137.237.90.89]:37615 "EHLO mlbe2k2.cs.myharris.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754161AbYHZOnC (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:43:02 -0400 Message-ID: <48B4159A.9070907@harris.com> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:39:22 -0400 From: "Steven A. Falco" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alessandro Zummo CC: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, will.newton@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [RFC] Driver for Real Time Clock chip ST M41T65 References: <48B2EB77.9000103@harris.com> <87a5b0800808260130i383ec8d0y45690f85366c5059@mail.gmail.com> <48B40B68.1040607@harris.com> <87a5b0800808260700g52cedf59kb07880ae05a104b@mail.gmail.com> <20080826161353.6326f6e2@i1501.lan.towertech.it> In-Reply-To: <20080826161353.6326f6e2@i1501.lan.towertech.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Aug 2008 14:39:23.0342 (UTC) FILETIME=[882E4EE0:01C90789] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1303 Lines: 32 Alessandro Zummo wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:00:03 +0100 > "Will Newton" wrote: > > >>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: >>>>> I will be using a Real Time Clock chip, ST M41T65, on a new embedded system. >>>>> The chip is quite similar to the M41T8x family, which already has driver >>>>> rtc-m41t80.c. >>>>> >>>>> Would it be more acceptible to generalize rtc-m41t80.c (perhaps renaming it to >>>>> rtc-m41txx.c) or would it be better to create a new rtc-m41t6x.c? >>> Thanks for the feedback. Here is a respin which addresses your comments. >>> >>> I'd also like to know if I should submit a new driver or mod the existing >>> one. If I mod the existing one, should it be renamed, should I update the >>> Kconfig, existing defconfigs, etc? > > Given the small amount of changes, I would use the existing driver without > renaming it. > Sounds good. Please let me know if there are other changes needed to make this patch acceptable for inclusion into the mainline. Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/