Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760048AbYHZTiF (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:38:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756515AbYHZThw (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:37:52 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:53153 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755541AbYHZThv (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:37:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:28:48 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Travis , "Alan D. Brunelle" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , Rusty Russell , "Siddha, Suresh B" , "Luck, Tony" , Jack Steiner , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c - bisected Message-ID: <20080826192848.GA20653@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Mike Travis , "Alan D. Brunelle" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , Rusty Russell , "Siddha, Suresh B" , "Luck, Tony" , Jack Steiner , Christoph Lameter References: <48B29F7B.6080405@hp.com> <48B2A421.7080705@hp.com> <48B313E0.1000501@hp.com> <48B452F3.9040304@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2010 Lines: 48 On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:09:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > If you want the default kernel to support 4k cores, we'll need to fix the > stack usage. I don't think that is impossible, but IT IS NOT GOING TO > HAPPEN for 2.6.27. > > And quite frankly, if some vendor like RedHat enables NR_CPUS=4096 by > default, they are totally and utterly crazy. heh. *picks through Fedora changelog* * Thu Aug 14 2008 Dave Jones - Bump max cpus supported on x86-64 to 4096. Just to see what happens. I never did get to find out unfortunatly, because of the security fiasco in Fedora infrastructure the last week or two. > But some SGI-specific binary that is meant for SGI machines only, and has > been extensively tested with the setup used on SGI machines is a different > thing. Every extra kernel image a distro vendor ends up shipping has an associated cost. * build time: It currently takes about 2 hours for a set of Fedora RPMs. For RHEL it'll be even worse due to the extra archs). Killing off -smp specific builds was a big win for us in this regard. Adding extra flavours is always painful. * diskspace (distro kernels aren't small. With the associated debugging symbols, they take up a shitload of disk space really fast). * Having everyone running the same kernel makes it much easier to test/debug. Our QA guys hate adding extra columns to their test matrix. But yes, for this to be even remotely feasible, there has to be a negligable performance cost associated with it, which right now, we clearly don't have. Given that the number of people running 4096 CPU boxes even in a few years time will still be tiny, punishing the common case is obviously absurd. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/