Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754050AbYH0HjT (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:39:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752713AbYH0HjA (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:39:00 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:17217 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752234AbYH0Hi6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:38:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=vnAAdEYGSEx/STtk6441y1CKpJMgvFCOcxWWE2tBDrUDCeDiRv6Gh4Eh1pew9hGgY6 hQr7m8W5KPyKUM+zMlAfXcHw2KjbONka6qJVUZo/wuZwYRp7c9H9Fepeu1STDaXXh6sc Wma79+hzaR6dkp2N4K/yMhs/DUEQCr3kRdzIA= Message-ID: <1ba2fa240808270038r24d5eeb9l36fd70ef5ae904f5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:38:56 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-26 Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080827013009.GA15781@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080827013009.GA15781@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 31 On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 4:30 AM, John W. Linville wrote: > Dave, > > Here is the latest round of fixes intended for 2.6.27. I think > the non-iwlwifi ones are pretty solid. As for the iwlwifi ones, > the Intel guys assure me that these are important changes. > > You will notice that (despite my exhortations) no less than two of > the iwlwifi patches declare themselves as cleanups. I have included > them anyway because the later fixes depend on them and they seemed > harmless enough. Plus, they were posted (or at least written) before > the recent fireworks about what we should be merging after -rc1... > PCI cleanup patch is badly named. It fixes PCI registers sizes and ads one forgotten hw workaround I called it cleanup because it went through all PCI accesses we have in the driver. Scan cleanup was requested because of dependencies but it's harmless, we can rebase the patches prefer not it's just waste of time. Afther massive ath9k merge I didn't see it was a conceptual problem. Thanks Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/