Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755361AbYH0KKc (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:10:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753904AbYH0KKO (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:10:14 -0400 Received: from ms01.sssup.it ([193.205.80.99]:49915 "EHLO sssup.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754377AbYH0KKM (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:10:12 -0400 Message-ID: <48B527F6.6040705@evidence.eu.com> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:09:58 +0200 From: Claudio Scordino User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Dooks CC: lg@denx.de, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, Linux Kernel , marc.pignat@hevs.ch Subject: Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type References: <48B3DB29.5070409@evidence.eu.com> <20080826131736.GA1916@fluff.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20080826131736.GA1916@fluff.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1653 Lines: 59 Ben Dooks ha scritto: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:30:01PM +0200, Claudio Scordino wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a custom board equivalent to AT91RM9200DK. > > Is that exactly the same, or does it have changes? No, it's really equivalent, that's why I used the same configuration. > > Note, this should have been sent to the linux-arm-kernel list, where > it will be read by more of the developers who work on ARM, we don't > all have time to sit on linux-kernel. I see. I thought the right place for this kind of question was the LKML. I will use linux-arm-kernel for future issues about Linux on ARM. Anyway, eventually I found out that this is a bug of U-Boot (see later) and not of Linux. > >> After commit >> >> 87fee013a23ad02821699aef5b76891b42959182 >> >> [ARM] 4647/1: at91rm9200: Remove redundant machine-type verification >> and manipulation >> >> I cannot boot my board anymore. > > Hmm, having looked at this, it would be very probably that your > u-boot is not passing the right boot information to the kernel. Right. U-Boot does not pass the right value when compiled for the AT91RM9200DK board... I'm going to send an email to the U-Boot ML to fix this bug. Many thanks to all, Claudio -- Ing. Claudio Scordino Software Engineer, PhD Tel. +39-050-5492050 http://retis.sssup.it/~scordino/ Evidence Srl Embedded Real-Time Solutions http://www.evidence.eu.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/