Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755798AbYH0NL2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:11:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754653AbYH0NLQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:11:16 -0400 Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:43770 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754574AbYH0NLP (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:11:15 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: "Tomas Winkler" Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-26 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:10:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) Cc: "Johannes Berg" , "Marcel Holtmann" , "David Miller" , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20080827013009.GA15781@tuxdriver.com> <1219831828.3891.3.camel@johannes.berg> <1ba2fa240808270434y1589761xd2ff0a48c2e99033@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240808270434y1589761xd2ff0a48c2e99033@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808271510.35950.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1380 Lines: 25 On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > should use Linux upstream as your development tree and then branch off > > of that for the internal stabilisation trees you need for other > > customers, rather than having some sort of internal development tree and > > branching out Linux upstream as you appear to work. > > Unfortunately fixing bugs on stable branch take precedence of > adjusting to new API on development branch that someone decided to do. > I wanted to work directly on wireless testing but it was broken over > an over and I have only limited resources more in testing then in > development I just had to branch out to be ready with the driver when > HW is out. People just check the immediate impact of they fix the > don't test for collateral damage and this is understandable an > individual developer doesn't have lab with IBSS, BSS, AP, etc setups. I think it would be an advantage for you to develop in wireless-testing and use wireless-2.6 and probably additionally some internal trees as stable trees. Like everybody else does it. The advantage is simple: You get more people testing your code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/