Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:18:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:18:24 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:35525 "HELO gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:18:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:18:06 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: Stuart Young Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Olaf Dietsche , John Weber Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin Message-ID: <20020129201806.B12201@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To: <3C5600A6.3080605@nyc.rr.com> <87n0yxqa6e.fsf@tigram.bogus.local> <5.1.0.14.0.20020130113958.00a04390@mail.amc.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020130113958.00a04390@mail.amc.localnet>; from sgy@amc.com.au on Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:00:11PM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:00:11PM +1100, Stuart Young wrote: > Perhaps it's time we set up a specific lkml-patch mailing list, and leave I like the suggestion (most recently, of Daniel? pardon if I miscredit) of having patches-2.[45]@vger.kernel.org type addresses, which would archive patches, and have a high noise-to-signal ratio. Maybe even filter out all non-patches. The big issue I cannot decide upon is whether standard e-mails should be To: torvalds@ CC: patches-2.4@ or just To: patches-2.4@ (I'm guessing Linus would prefer the first, but who knows) Also, something noone has mentioned is out-of-band patches. Security fixes and other patches which for various reasons go straight to Linus. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/