Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:39:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:39:35 -0500 Received: from dsl254-112-233.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.112.233]:42898 "EHLO snark.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:39:19 -0500 Message-Id: <200201300139.g0U1d2U23149@snark.thyrsus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rob Landley To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:40:11 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: Skip Ford , , Andrea Arcangeli In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 29 January 2002 06:50 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Rob Landley wrote: > > > Ah. So being listed in the maintainers list doesn't mean someone is > > actually a maintainer it makes sense to forward patches to? > > Sure it does. > > It just doesn't mean that they should send stuff to _me_. > > Did you not understand my point about scalability? I was asking for clarification. > I can work with a > limited number of people, and those people can work with _their_ limited > number of people etc etc. I.E. a tree structure. > The MAINTAINERS file is _not_ a list of people I work with on a daily > basis. In fact, I don't necessarily even recognize the names of all those > people. > > Let's take an example. Let's say that you had a patch for ppp. You'd send > the patch to Paul Mackerras. He, in turn, would send his patches to David > Miller (who knows a hell of a lot better what it's all about than I do). > And he in turn sends them to me. > > They are both maintainers. That doesn't mean that I necessarily work with > every maintainer directly. Okay, so there's a tree of maintainers, and some maintainers seem unaware that they should be sending their patches to other maintainers rather than directly to you? Does this seem like a valid assessment of at least part of the problem? > Why? Because having hundreds of people emailing me _obviously_ doesn't > scale. Never has, never will. It may work over short timeperiods wih lots > of energy, but it obviously isn't a stable setup. Well at least we agree on something. :) > Linus Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/