Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755448AbYH0SjP (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:39:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752688AbYH0Si7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:38:59 -0400 Received: from smtp117.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.90]:39468 "HELO smtp117.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752554AbYH0Si6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:38:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=F2xut11xAVOWuuLWqe8/6tpHT1TfO7F5ilm73keJuF9na5deFWNkcylV4v1iYNvnVDE8aQj1A2fFm1nVv0qhduL0p2hxJZC+Iand1vE0fYaFsQjwtd4pu0r1sVkmUUy/OGsTdFQVgpDFrWxIWdrUdgL59CCNdiU7tuUuHp+j6Fc= ; X-YMail-OSG: bMt9IDMVM1ktV23UDvq8Hyo30kL.olxRDtcKHCMU_rf.jFNWDAaZo92unCpsGAm1WM7OSPsPxkP1ELpGJN2EH2oqv5m6srkRlS5tF3UShmpOnj_UO6Lz12gpkvgZT0E- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: Greg KH Subject: Re: USB Serial device disconnect causes IRQ disable after using ehci controller halted Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:37:23 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: amruth_pv@yahoo.com, Alan Stern , Karsten Wiese , Oliver Neukum , USB list , Kernel development list References: <434860.93444.qm@web45203.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <200808262335.05204.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080827175325.GB31820@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20080827175325.GB31820@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808271137.24557.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1163 Lines: 27 On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > As noted by Stefan Neis , we had a recent > > regression with EHCI periodic transfers, in some (seemingly not > > all that common) cases. > > > > The root cause was that the schedule activation was only loosely > > coupled to the addition or removal of transfers, so two different > > execution contexts could both think they had to deactivate (or > > conversely activate) the schedule. ?So this fix tightens that > > coupling, managing it more like a refcount. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Brownell > > Do you want me to also apply this one? ?If so, for .27 or .28? It should get into 2.6.27, and probably 26.stable ... assuming that it checks out properly. A somewhat cruftier version resolved Stefan's problem, but I'd rather not merge that one. Hmm, I'll ask Stefan to confirm this version. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/