Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755396AbYH0XVp (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:21:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753563AbYH0XVf (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:21:35 -0400 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:38423 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751346AbYH0XVe (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:21:34 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:21:20 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: David Howells Cc: Artem Bityutskiy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Serge Hallyn , Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/59] CRED: Wrap task credential accesses in the IA64 arch Message-Id: <20080828092120.b9b198bb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <25475.1219850678@redhat.com> References: <48B56ADA.8010808@yandex.ru> <20080827134541.19980.61042.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20080827134547.19980.38813.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <25475.1219850678@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__28_Aug_2008_09_21_20_+1000_X_XPTG5ZPJHlSZRb" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1765 Lines: 53 --Signature=_Thu__28_Aug_2008_09_21_20_+1000_X_XPTG5ZPJHlSZRb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi David, Artem, On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:24:38 +0100 David Howells wrot= e: > > Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >=20 > > Fine with me. >=20 > Can I count that as an Acked-by? >=20 > > Do you want us to put this patch to ubifs-2.6.git or you > > prefer to make it go together with the rest of the CRED patches? >=20 > Ummm... I'll check. I'm not sure exactly how Stephen wanted to play thi= s. I am happy for these patches to go into both the subsystem and creds trees (the mess - if any - will be on my head). I do expect this to reduce conflicts in the longer term. It is much better for that to happen than for a subsystem maintainer to apply a slightly different fixup when I find a conflict. If there is not conflict between the subsystem tree and the creds tree, then it doesn't matter if the patch is in both trees or not. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Thu__28_Aug_2008_09_21_20_+1000_X_XPTG5ZPJHlSZRb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAki14XAACgkQjjKRsyhoI8zPDwCfZJgXfWVihB1ZyDKMmnzfmyQi JzAAoJjY/iI3TWx9UAkKoRzvU4NVrSpX =2qhH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__28_Aug_2008_09_21_20_+1000_X_XPTG5ZPJHlSZRb-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/