Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:22:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:21:55 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:40207 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:21:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 03:21:38 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Robert Love Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , viro@math.psu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek Message-ID: <20020130032138.H16379@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Robert Love , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , viro@math.psu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: , <1012351309.813.56.camel@phantasy> <3C574BD1.E5343312@zip.com.au> <1012357211.817.67.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1012357211.817.67.camel@phantasy>; from rml@tech9.net on Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:20:10PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:20:10PM -0500, Robert Love wrote: > I feared this too, but eventually I decided it was worth it and > benchmarks backed that up. If nothing else this is yet-another-excuse > for locks that can spin-then-sleep. > I posted dbench results, which show a positive gain even on 2-way for > multiple client loads. did you benchmark with anything other than dbench ? -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/