Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756698AbYH1Ap3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:45:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754665AbYH1ApN (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:45:13 -0400 Received: from smtp115.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.84.164]:32215 "HELO smtp115.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754004AbYH1ApL (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:45:11 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=35gRYWEeVYRek4h74mOVuWMgOMjFVko44zwdLe5rWPXRw3zA71XqCf4hBmDsWRMKfhIyNTvtm9zmUqrScK8Wv51FKlCBPRiexQWOD+7QkVKr9wFFGZR2KrWk2bf21L9iKScFU0JAHI7UB0ben/+gbiuHc7I1/L2A4X43z405tF8= ; X-YMail-OSG: iGXDKakVM1m58AxL_D7mpPINQi3xi4bo1n9KGwlnMCU3rk8SCERNopYmChObpUB6iNl_aqp8s8Js9H4_bTxUAe0nDj.uFlEDWtMT861dnSNtQhlMN5.N3fKCQrFFm2mIfadJ.riG9LXDJnIcy3X07oqK X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: loaded router, excessive getnstimeofday in oprofile Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:45:03 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: David Miller , rick.jones2@hp.com, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, dada1@cosmosbay.com, denys@visp.net.lb, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <87vdxmr53f.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20080827.151824.14173512.davem@davemloft.net> <20080827223952.GE26610@one.firstfloor.org> In-Reply-To: <20080827223952.GE26610@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808281045.03460.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1125 Lines: 25 On Thursday 28 August 2008 08:39, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 03:18:24PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Andi Kleen > > Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:27:35 +0200 > > > > > > Those banks really want to crank down on latency - to the point they > > > > start disabling interrupt coalescing. I bet they'd toss anything out > > > > they could to shave another microsecond. > > > > > > This change would actually likely lower their latency. > > > > They want the timestamps, but they want it to match when the packet > > arrived at their system as closely as is reasonably possible. > > Then they should use hardware time stamps which are increasingly > available (e.g. current Intel e1000 design has them and I expect > others too). Would it make sense to make a new option for these socket timestamps and encourage some apps move over to it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/