Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755594AbYH1Qde (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:33:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752856AbYH1Qd0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:33:26 -0400 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:45708 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752386AbYH1QdZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:33:25 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5200,2160,5372"; a="5937428" Message-ID: <48B6D353.6040001@qualcomm.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:33:23 -0700 From: Max Krasnyansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Piggin CC: Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Stefani Seibold , Dario Faggioli , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default References: <20080819103301.787700742@chello.nl> <20080828141513.GC31444@goodmis.org> <20080828143042.GA12644@elte.hu> <200808290036.35817.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200808290036.35817.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1515 Lines: 33 Nick Piggin wrote: > On Friday 29 August 2008 00:30, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Steven Rostedt wrote: >>> For this, if this time limit does kick in, we should at the very least >>> print something out to let the user know this happened. After all, >>> this is more of a safety net anyway, and if we are hitting the limit, >>> the user should be notified. Perhaps even tell the user that if this >>> behaviour is expected, to up the sysctl by more. >> yeah, agreed, this is a reasonable suggestion. Peter, do you agree? > > Seems reasonable. But I still think it should be disabled by default > (it might not get caught in testing for example). I cannot believe you guys are still arguing about this and calling each other stupid/incompetent/braindead and such (not this particular email but all the stuff before) :) Seems to me like leaving RT throttling disabled by default is a reasonable compromise. Several people suggested that and the advantage is that it does not change the definition of SCHED_FIFO/RR by default. I personally do not care that much what the default is. If Fedora, for example, starts enabling it by default I'll still have to change it. So it's not much different from enabled by default in the kernel. Max -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/