Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:37:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:37:24 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:60609 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:37:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:37:11 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: Daniel Phillips cc: mingo@elte.hu, Rob Landley , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Note who the email is addressed to. I have tried many different techniques > for communicating with this gentleman, including self-deprecation, and they > all seem to have the same result Trying a bit of intellectual honesty would help big way. Realizing that ext2 patches should be sent to ext2 maintainers would help even more. You've spent _months_ ignoring the idea above. You've tried many different techniques for what, exactly? To push that stuff to a guy who is not, was not and had never been maintainer of the code in question? Wow. And yes, it had been told to you from the very beginning. tytso, sct and akpm are the right guys for such stuff. It's their code, they do maintain it and I think in all cases I've sent ext2 patches it was only after ACK from ext2 folks. If it took you a fscking year to realize that, despite having it explained to you in details... Don't you feel yourself an idiot? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/