Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756680AbYH1SoS (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:44:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752842AbYH1SoF (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:44:05 -0400 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:36543 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753779AbYH1SoE (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:44:04 -0400 Message-ID: <48B6F12F.1010909@cs.helsinki.fi> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:40:47 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dobriyan CC: Vegard Nossum , David Miller , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API References: <20080828183223.GA30781@localhost.localdomain> <20080828184025.GA22165@x200.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20080828184025.GA22165@x200.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 736 Lines: 18 Hi Alexey, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 08:32:23PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote: >> How do you feel about this patch? It's all about making kmemcheck more >> useful... and not much else. Does it have any chance of entering the >> kernel along with kmemcheck (when/if that happens)? > > DEFINE_BITFIELD is horrible. Heh, heh, one alternative is to have a kmemcheck_memset() thingy that unconditionally zeroes bit fields and maybe is a no-op when kmemcheck is disabled. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/