Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756978AbYH1Tk6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:40:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755052AbYH1Tkq (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:40:46 -0400 Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net ([192.88.158.103]:46475 "EHLO az33egw02.freescale.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753523AbYH1Tkp (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:40:45 -0400 Message-ID: <48B6E62D.4060606@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:53:49 -0500 From: Scott Wood User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Stern CC: Arnd Bergmann , dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net, greg@kroah.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Li Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: add Freescale QE/CPM USB peripheral controller driver References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 648 Lines: 16 Alan Stern wrote: > This was done deliberately. The relevant standards state that a USB > device can have no more than one peripheral interface. Does building a kernel image that can run on different hardware without rebuilding also violate the "relevant standards"? And who's to say that there aren't multiple USB devices on a single board, that just happen to share a CPU and memory? :-) -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/