Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 03:12:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 03:10:47 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:44296 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 03:09:44 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 00:09:03 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alexander Viro cc: Daniel Phillips , , Rob Landley , Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Alexander Viro wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Linus just called you the ext2 maintainer. > > Message-ID, please? I called you the VFS maintainer ("whether you like it or not" I think I said. Although I can't find the message right now). Now, that obviously does imply a certain control over low-level filesystems, but it really mainly implies a control over the _interfaces_ used to talk the the filesystem, not the filesystem itself. I personally really wouldn't mind seeing most filesystem patches coming through Al (and, in fact, in the inode trimming patches that is partly what as been happening), but I have this nagging suspicion that some filesystem maintainers would rather eat barbed wire (*). Linus (*) The discussions between Gooch and Al are always "interesting", to name some names. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/