Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758610AbYH2RDR (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:03:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754831AbYH2RC7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:02:59 -0400 Received: from victor.provo.novell.com ([137.65.250.26]:54327 "EHLO victor.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754566AbYH2RC6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:02:58 -0400 Message-ID: <48B82B2A.6010806@novell.com> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:00:26 -0400 From: Gregory Haskins User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080720) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt CC: Andi Kleen , Gregory Haskins , mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers References: <20080829154237.1196.66825.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <87abevpzv7.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <48B81F60.3080409@gmail.com> <20080829162216.GW26610@one.firstfloor.org> <48B82349.1020109@gmail.com> <48B8254D.1010206@gmail.com> <20080829164551.GY26610@one.firstfloor.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=D8195319 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF4DBF2361103993097DC0399" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2863 Lines: 89 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF4DBF2361103993097DC0399 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Steven Rostedt wrote: > The subject forgot to add "RT" in the brackets. > > On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Andi Kleen wrote: > > =20 >>> I could just force all of the seqbegins to hit the slowpath by hackin= g >>> the code and see what happens (aside from slowing down, of course ;) >>> =20 >> Only if you don't believe it will really crash? I think it's pretty >> clear even without trying it. >> >> =20 >>> Question: Which seqlock_t does userspace use? I assume it uses >>> seqlock_t and not raw_seqlock_t.=20 >>> =20 >>> But the only reason that I ask is that >>> I converted raw_seqlock_t to use the new style as well to be consiste= nt, >>> =20 >> There's no raw_seqlock_t anywhere in mainline? >> =20 > > Nope, raw_seqlock_t in -rt is equivelant to seqlock_t in mainline. > > =20 >> Anyways the variable is declared (in mainline) in asm-x86/vgtod.h=20 >> >> =20 >>> even though it is not strictly necessary for the same reasons. So if= >>> perchance userspace uses the raw variant, I could solve this issue by= >>> only re-working the seqlock_t variant. Kind of a long shot, but figu= red >>> I would mention it :) >>> =20 >> I guess you could define a new seqlock_t which is explicitely user spa= ce >> safe. That might avoid such issues in the future. But then >> that would likely require some code duplication and be ugly. >> >> On the other hand whatever problem you fixing in the kernel >> (to be honest it's still unclear to me what the problem is) >> needs to be likely fixed for the userland lock too. >> =20 > > I'm not convinced that the raw_seqlocks (mainline normal seqlocks) has = a=20 > problem anyway. > =20 (continuing from IRC) Agreed. I converted them to be consistent. Steve just told me that userspace actually uses the raw_seqlock_t variant, so the answer is simple. Just leave raw_seqlock_t alone and the patch will work fine. Thoughts? -Greg --------------enigF4DBF2361103993097DC0399 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAki4KyoACgkQlOSOBdgZUxlt7ACggWsLsaxeN6P+UEblZyFrORv4 Zy0An0zODsB09V2r29WLHyxRa8MLzXu8 =2cBr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF4DBF2361103993097DC0399-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/