Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 03:48:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 03:48:03 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:55758 "HELO gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 03:47:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 03:47:46 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: Rob Landley Cc: Miles Lane , Chris Ricker , World Domination Now! Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin Message-ID: <20020130034746.K32317@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To: <1012354692.1777.4.camel@stomata.megapathdsl.net> <20020130080504.JUTO18525.femail19.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020130080504.JUTO18525.femail19.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there>; from landley@trommello.org on Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:06:15AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:06:15AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > If the "patches-to-linus" list does get implemented, it would probably also > be fairly easy to automatically match new pre-X->pre-Y diffs against the > recent patches from the list, and extract most of the information that way. > (Assuming Linus doesn't modify them too much, or end up taking a lot of > patches from other sources. A human would probably still have to do at least > part of it, but it might be an improvement on just putting the whole big > version diff in the cvs tree as one lump...) Instead of doing this stuff half-assed, just convince Linus to use BK :) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/