Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:19:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:18:57 -0500 Received: from mailgate.bridgetrading.com ([62.49.201.178]:43471 "EHLO directcommunications.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:18:36 -0500 From: "Chris Funderburg" To: "'Jeff Garzik'" , "'Oliver Xymoron'" Cc: "'Daniel Phillips'" , "'linux-kernel'" Subject: RE: bug tracking (was Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:18:15 -0000 Message-ID: <000901c1a96f$13963680$0105360a@bti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: <20020130030950.E32317@havoc.gtf.org> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm confused. Wouldn't Bugzilla be perfect for this? I run a slightly modified version for the company I work for. You could have as many administrators as you need, and use categories for different kernel subsystems. The maintainers could be set-up as QA contacts, and it's really easy to maintain. How about http://bugzilla.kernel.org (assuming the servers get fixed someday) Just a thought. -----Original Message----- From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Garzik Sent: 30 January 2002 08:10 To: Oliver Xymoron Cc: Daniel Phillips; linux-kernel Subject: bug tracking (was Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin) On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:41:22AM -0600, Oliver Xymoron wrote: > The gross fixes tend to get dropped because if they're in, the proper fix > loses priority. FIXMEs can take many years to fix. The problem seems not > to be the dropping of the patch so much as the dropping of the bug report > and bug tracking is an altogether different problem. Indeed. The issue of kernel bug tracking gets pondered and discussed every few months it seems (not without need, mind you). To tie this back into the original whine from RobL, what we do NOT need is a patch secretary. What we do need, desperately, is (a) a bug-tracking system, and (b) at least one sharp person, with bunches of help from kernel developers and users alike, to close fixed bugs, ping users, clear out garbage so that the bug database has a very high signal-to-noise ratio. Good kernel bug tracking can be done, but it requires human maintenance, by someone or someones with a brain. It cannot be done without plenty of automation, though, as tytso (god bless him for trying!) showed... Such would be a significant boon to -all- Linux users. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/