Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754706AbYH3G6u (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:58:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751426AbYH3G6k (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:58:40 -0400 Received: from web82102.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.84.215]:27146 "HELO web82102.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751061AbYH3G6k (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:58:40 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=OrMQz65iNnznvfFYcq3zT0PlnREGl/SoUj+6sYtcMPgU1g+KrzLMHsM97Etywv8zaMMdhHsPzNeQhItIrutG87E7Wx1GfIOqwF+12Z3ORaitWygTC5EW+XNzsh2R4tBEOsBqh7e4Bd9EpwX+YMobQ+pmYZF1qSHKLhQ0ytyCTxY=; X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1042.40 YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:58:39 -0700 (PDT) From: David Witbrodt Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc5: System boot regression caused by commit a2bd7274b47124d2fc4dfdb8c0591f545ba749dd To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Yinghai Lu , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jeff Garzik , Tejun Heo , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <734251.73444.qm@web82102.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1485 Lines: 38 > > Sorry if I am interfering... just wanted to inject this data, in case > > it's meaningful! > > Yeah, nothing has changed yet for your case. What should change your case > is the thing Yinghai is working on with the "late add of e820 data to the > resource tree". OK. > His earlier version already worked for you, didn't it? We're really now > just finalizing details (in fact, "insert_resource_expand_to_fit()" is > just a helper function for a detail that may not even matter all that > much). Yes, it worked fine! :D BTW, there was an individual who reported a regression back in May on the very same commit. I was not able to get him to participate in the process of tracking this down, but he did (suddenly) write a post on his blog a couple of days ago that he had success using some unspecified git tree HEAD. I believe that was probably the patch that you have reverted, so once I know that a new candidate is in place I will let him know on his blog and see if I can talk him into trying it. This has been a month-long quest for me -- beginning on Aug. 4 -- and I can understand why he gave up in May without resolving the issue. It's too bad for all of us that he didn't pursue it then, huh? Thanks, Dave W. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/