Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:45:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:44:56 -0500 Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]:58295 "EHLO waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:44:40 -0500 Message-Id: <200201300944.g0U9iOeO002104@tigger.cs.uni-dortmund.de> To: Russell King cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin In-Reply-To: Message from Russell King of "Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:43:07 GMT." <20020129144307.B6542@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:44:24 +0100 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Russell King said: [...] > If we're going to be doing this periodically, it might be an idea to > put "out of order since dd mmm yyyy" and a "last checked dd mmm yyyy" > at the top of the file. Perhaps add a "Last checked: field to each (too)? But then again, patches to MAINTAINERS are silently dropped. Perhaps this should be posted on kernel.org? -- Horst von Brand http://counter.li.org # 22616 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/