Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:57:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:57:46 -0500 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:9993 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:57:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3C57C38B.30101@namesys.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:57:31 +0300 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7+) Gecko/20020123 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Xymoron CC: Chris Mason , Alexander Viro , Daniel Phillips , Linus Torvalds , Josh MacDonald , linux-kernel , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com Subject: Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Note describing poor dcache utilization under high memory pressure In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oliver Xymoron wrote: > >Can we get you to agree that basically all subpage objects are immovable? > No. Certainly not in the general case, and I think Josh found ways to handle the dcache case. If we can simply free the old objects, we don't actually have to move the hot ones, as he points out. > >And as a consequence that garbage collecting at subpage levels doesn't >guarantee freeing up any pages that can then be given up to other >subsystems in response to VM pressure? The GC must think in terms of pages >to actually make progress. > >One of the design goals of slab by the way is that objects of a similar >type will end up having similar lifetimes, avoiding some of the worst >cases of sub-page allocations. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/