Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 05:02:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 05:02:06 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-038-145.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.38.145]:32655 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 05:01:55 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:05:42 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: , Rob Landley , In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On January 30, 2002 10:21 am, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > > Frankly, the only real issue in that thread was that we _do_ need > > a tree specifically for small fixes. Preferably - quickly getting merged > > into the main tree. > > A "small stuff" maintainer may indeed be a good idea. The maintainer could > be the same as somebody who does bigger stuff too, but they should be > clearly different things - trivial one-liners that do not add anything > new, only fix obvious stuff (to the point where nobody even needs to think > about it - if I'd start getting any even halfway questionable patches from > the "small stuff" maintainer, it wouldn't work). But that's exactly what Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo[1] does, has been doing for more than a year, surely you've noticed? On top of being the nicest guy in the world, as far as I can tell. [1] Most of us call him . -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/