Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759731AbYH3Vf1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:35:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757765AbYH3VZY (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:25:24 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:58195 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755586AbYH3VZV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:25:21 -0400 Cc: Kernel Testers List , "Daniel J Blueman" , "Vegard Nossum" References: In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: Subject: [Bug #11410] SLUB list_lock vs obj_hash.lock... To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:50:24 +0200 (CEST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 882 Lines: 22 This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11410 Subject : SLUB list_lock vs obj_hash.lock... Submitter : Daniel J Blueman Date : 2008-08-22 21:48 (9 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121944176609042&w=4 Handled-By : Vegard Nossum Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121993767320698&w=4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/