Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 06:42:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 06:42:15 -0500 Received: from tangens.hometree.net ([212.34.181.34]:38282 "EHLO mail.hometree.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 06:42:06 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: forge.intermeta.de!not-for-mail From: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" Newsgroups: hometree.linux.kernel Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Organization: INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH Lines: 42 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20020129144753.D9149@suse.de> Reply-To: hps@intermeta.de NNTP-Posting-Host: forge.intermeta.de X-Trace: tangens.hometree.net 1012390924 31483 212.34.181.4 (30 Jan 2002 11:42:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@intermeta.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:42:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Copyright: (C) 1996-2002 Henning Schmiedehausen X-No-Archive: yes X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.1 (NOV) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dave Jones writes: > Now that we have an open development branch again, perhaps its > time for a lot of the things that have been proven stable in vendor > kernels for a long time to get a looksee in mainline. > Some things I feel will likely still be vendor-kernel only for some time. > And some of them, rightly so. Bah. RedHat puts what? 120+? Patches into 2.2 (!) to ship their vendor kernel. And it is still much more stable than any 2.4 I've encountered till today. I personally run a heavily patched 2.2 (+aa, +ide +reiser +ext3 +raid and so on) and still get uptimes on busy and heavily loaded servers (think newsserver with 50+ MBit/sec continous traffic. Think web accelerator for one of the busiest web sites in Germany. Think mail system for 1M users) far beyond 200 days uptime. Will these patches ever be integrated? No. And same will go to some sore spots of 2.4. Think RAID for 2.2. Think NFS for 2.2 where we almost had to strangle Alan just to put in the most obvious bug fixes from Trond :-) . In what? 2.2.16? Do we have NFSv3 over TCP (which is in the real world available for how many years?)? A really reliable IDE driver (Hi Andre :-) )? A raid code that won't stuble over recoverable SCSI errors? That does not interact badly with some FS types (and of course with those where RAID would be really interesting)? We have a kernel based Webserver. But not reliable media detection for run-of-the-mill network cards. Something which "that other OS" has since 1995. Regards Henning -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/