Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:30:26 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20080901.023026.55145642.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: david@fries.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, p_gortmaker@yahoo.com,
       netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ne.c msleep not mdelay
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20080830154447.770aaca0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
References: <20080830095906.6cad8647@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
	<20080830.233647.05599714.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
	<20080830154447.770aaca0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 743
Lines: 18

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:44:47 +0100, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > So, if rescheduling was dangerous here, we already have potential
> > problems, no?
> 
> Yes we do but I didn't manage to stop the other mistakes getting in when
> they did. If you take a schedule you get results back from the probe_irq
> that tend to suck in other random ISA device events (ISA being edge
> triggered nobody was ever careful about spurious irq)

OK, I see your point.  Thanks.

---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/