Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758813AbYHaTvl (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:51:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756660AbYHaTvd (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:51:33 -0400 Received: from smtp.opengridcomputing.com ([209.198.142.2]:38745 "EHLO smtp.opengridcomputing.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756595AbYHaTvc (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:51:32 -0400 Message-ID: <48BAF643.4070808@opengridcomputing.com> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:51:31 -0500 From: Tom Tucker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Campbell CC: "J. Bruce Fields" , Trond Myklebust , John Ronciak , Grant Coady , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Kirsher , Jesse Brandeburg , Bruce Allan , PJ Waskiewicz , John Ronciak , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: NFS regression? Odd delays and lockups accessing an NFS export. References: <1219442213.9097.25.camel@localhost> <1219603981.27921.145.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1219605422.14389.2.camel@localhost> <1219605596.14389.5.camel@localhost> <1219615789.27921.152.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1219616136.14389.12.camel@localhost> <48B2D7F8.5020206@opengridcomputing.com> <20080826192711.GJ4380@fieldses.org> <48B567F5.2090605@opengridcomputing.com> <1220111261.31172.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080831193037.GB14876@fieldses.org> <1220211842.31172.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1220211842.31172.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1889 Lines: 44 Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 15:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 04:47:41PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 09:43 -0500, Tom Tucker wrote: >>>> Sure. I've actually tried to reproduce it here unsuccessfully. >>>> >>>> As a starter, I would suggest turning on transport debugging: >>>> >>>> # echo 256 > /proc/sys/sunrpc/rpc_debug >>>> [...] >>>> If Ian is willing to create the log (or already has one), I'm >>>> certainly willing to look at it. >>> It produced only the following (is that what was expected?): >>> >>> [146866.448112] -pid- proc flgs status -client- -prog- --rqstp- -timeout -rpcwait -action- ---ops-- >>> [146866.448112] 30576 0001 00a0 0 f77a1600 100003 f7903340 15000 xprt_pending fa0ba88e fa0c9df4 >>> [146866.448112] 30577 0004 0080 -11 f77a1600 100003 f7903000 0 xprt_sending fa0ba88e fa0c9df4 >> It's normal to get something like that when you turn it on, yes (unless >> someone else spots anything odd about that...) but what's really needed >> is to turn this on and then reproduce the problem--it's the debugging >> output that goes to the logs during the problem that'll be interesting. > > That's what I did. The first time I did the echo I just got the header > line, then I waited for the repro and since there had been no further > logging I ran the echo again and got the three lines above. > > Sounds like you expected there to be more and ongoing logging? > > Ian. > Looks like you ran this on the client. Sorry, Ian, I should have been more specific. You need to modify the rpc_debug file on the server. Tom >> --b. >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/