Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:04:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:04:46 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:45073 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:04:29 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] KERN_INFO for devfs To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:16:53 +0000 (GMT) Cc: tao@acc.umu.se (David Weinehall), brand@jupiter.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Horst von Brand), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200201301232.g0UCWmt10496@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> from "Denis Vlasenko" at Jan 30, 2002 02:32:47 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Yes, but that may change (in theory, at least.) Consistency is a virtue. > > I'll do this cleanup if my KERN_INFO patches will be accepted, at least some > of them. So far only Richard Gooch replied... I ran some of them into 7ac1 but got rejects so I've dumped them out for now. They mostly look completely sensible - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/