Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753344AbYJBG2L (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 02:28:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751174AbYJBG15 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 02:27:57 -0400 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:45484 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbYJBG15 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 02:27:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:27:37 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Andrew Morton Cc: Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority Message-ID: <20081002062736.GR19428@kernel.dk> References: <20081001200034.65eb67d6@infradead.org> <20081001215638.3a65134c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081001215638.3a65134c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 878 Lines: 23 On Wed, Oct 01 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:00:34 -0700 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCH] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority > > You proposed this a while back and it didn't happen and I forget > why and the changelog doesn't mention any of that? I think you called for benchmark results, which I don't think happened. The patch definitely makes sense, so we should just make sure that we don't regress elsewhere. Honestly, I'd be surprised if we did... How about I just toss it into the 2.6.28 testing mix, plenty of time for testing and such? -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/