Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S289340AbSA3QFG>; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:05:06 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S289341AbSA3QE4>; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:04:56 -0500
Received: from rtlab.med.cornell.edu ([140.251.145.175]:13526 "HELO
	openlab.rtlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S289355AbSA3QEQ>;
	Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:04:16 -0500
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:04:15 -0500 (EST)
From: "Calin A. Culianu" <calin@ajvar.org>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Athlon Optimization Problem
In-Reply-To: <E16VheG-0005UP-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0201301103530.16147-100000@rtlab.med.cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Feel free!  You're the boss... :)

On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Really?  VIA's own stuff doesn't touch 0x95?  Hmm.  Well is there ever a
> > case where touching 0x95 solved ANYTHING?
> >
> > What do you think?  Should I change the patch to not touch 0x95?
>
> I don't know. I want to take just that bit out of the next 2.2.21pre and
> see what is reported
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/